Home → Suburbs → Compare
Waterbank vs Collie Burn
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
110 #8,678
👥 Population
55
$1,093/wk #732
💰 Median Weekly Income
$900/wk
$200/wk #7,374
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$220/wk
52 years
🎂 Median Age
48 years
$3,192/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,690/mo
$1,374/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,792/wk
$2,625/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,937/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Waterbank
14.6%
Affordable
Collie Burn
12.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Waterbank
♂ 52.8% ♀ 47.2%
Density: 0 people/km²
Collie Burn
♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 4 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Waterbank
Lower Rent Waterbank
Larger Population Waterbank
More Affordable Waterbank