Home → Suburbs → Compare
Watervale vs Mount Barker Springs
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
338 #5,768
👥 Population
174 #7,344
$778/wk #3,981
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,201/wk #420
$275/wk #5,547
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$200/wk #7,374
43 years
🎂 Median Age
49 years
$1,231/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,084/mo
$1,437/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$3,028/wk
$1,843/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,031/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Watervale
19.1%
Affordable
Mount Barker Springs
6.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Watervale
♂ 51.0% ♀ 49.0%
Density: 6 people/km²
Mount Barker Springs
♂ 52.6% ♀ 47.4%
Density: 20 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Mount Barker Springs
Lower Rent Mount Barker Springs
Larger Population Watervale
More Affordable Mount Barker Springs