Home → Suburbs → Compare
Whittingham vs Adaminaby
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
421 #5,325
👥 Population
339 #5,760
$760/wk #4,318
💰 Median Weekly Income
$588/wk #7,257
$320/wk #4,051
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$300/wk #4,529
45 years
🎂 Median Age
52 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,083/mo
$1,958/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$954/wk
$2,125/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,350/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Whittingham
16.3%
Affordable
Adaminaby
31.4%
Moderate Stress
👥 Demographics
Whittingham
♂ 53.9% ♀ 46.1%
Density: 10 people/km²
Adaminaby
♂ 54.5% ♀ 45.5%
Density: 1 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Whittingham
Lower Rent Adaminaby
Larger Population Whittingham
More Affordable Adaminaby