Home → Suburbs → Compare
Woodstock vs Downside
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
248 #6,436
👥 Population
124 #8,328
$614/wk #6,868
💰 Median Weekly Income
$969/wk #1,444
$216/wk #7,173
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$185/wk #7,826
53 years
🎂 Median Age
46 years
$2,292/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$1,812/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,583/wk
$1,892/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,833/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
2.6 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Woodstock
11.9%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Woodstock
♂ 52.2% ♀ 47.8%
Density: 13 people/km²
Downside
♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 2 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Downside
Lower Rent Downside
Larger Population Woodstock
More Affordable Downside