Home → Suburbs → Compare
Woolloongabba vs Fig Tree Pocket
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
8,687 #804
👥 Population
4,345 #1,781
$866/wk #2,541
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,205/wk #410
$440/wk #1,252
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$590/wk #259
29 years
🎂 Median Age
40 years
$2,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$3,033/mo
$1,863/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$3,791/wk
$2,371/wk
👪 Family Income
$4,226/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Woolloongabba
23.6%
Affordable
Fig Tree Pocket
15.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Woolloongabba
♂ 50.4% ♀ 49.6%
Density: 3479 people/km²
Fig Tree Pocket
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 1015 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Fig Tree Pocket
Lower Rent Woolloongabba
Larger Population Woolloongabba
More Affordable Woolloongabba