Batesford vs Enfield

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,141 #3,780
👥 Population
574 #4,819
$952/wk #1,593
💰 Median Weekly Income
$793/wk #3,695
$325/wk #3,947
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$285/wk #5,291
39 years
🎂 Median Age
39 years
$2,268/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,335/mo
$2,837/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,882/wk
$2,881/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,045/wk
3.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Batesford

11.5%
Affordable

Enfield

15.1%
Affordable

Batesford

♂ 51.4% ♀ 48.6%
Density: 80 people/km²

Enfield

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 6 people/km²
Higher Income Batesford
Lower Rent Enfield
Larger Population Batesford
More Affordable Enfield

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level