Beaconsfield vs Twin Waters

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
5,899 #1,326
👥 Population
2,966 #2,433
$811/wk #3,416
💰 Median Weekly Income
$780/wk #3,938
$350/wk #3,104
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$650/wk #121
37 years
🎂 Median Age
60 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,726/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,689/wk
$2,055/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,919/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
2.3 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Beaconsfield

20.3%
Affordable

Twin Waters

38.5%
Rent Stressed

Beaconsfield

♂ 48.9% ♀ 51.1%
Density: 848 people/km²

Twin Waters

♂ 47.9% ♀ 52.1%
Density: 757 people/km²
Higher Income Beaconsfield
Lower Rent Beaconsfield
Larger Population Beaconsfield
More Affordable Beaconsfield

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level