Home → Suburbs → Compare
Coonamble vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
2,666 #2,616
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$641/wk #6,411
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$190/wk #7,769
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
38 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$883/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$1,206/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$1,460/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Coonamble
15.8%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Coonamble
♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 2 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Coonamble
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Coonamble