Home → Suburbs → Compare
Emu Park vs Kinka Beach
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
2,281 #2,839
👥 Population
674 #4,563
$617/wk #6,818
💰 Median Weekly Income
$552/wk #7,704
$300/wk #4,529
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$298/wk #5,053
54 years
🎂 Median Age
56 years
$1,517/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,410/mo
$1,192/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$867/wk
$1,435/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,170/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Emu Park
25.2%
Moderate Stress
Kinka Beach
34.4%
Moderate Stress
👥 Demographics
Emu Park
♂ 50.3% ♀ 49.7%
Density: 105 people/km²
Kinka Beach
♂ 46.1% ♀ 53.9%
Density: 91 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Emu Park
Lower Rent Kinka Beach
Larger Population Emu Park
More Affordable Kinka Beach