Home → Suburbs → Compare
Manningham vs Cockatoo Valley
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,391 #3,497
👥 Population
714 #4,463
$877/wk #2,406
💰 Median Weekly Income
$886/wk #2,299
$320/wk #4,051
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$383/wk #2,419
39 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$2,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,963/mo
$1,971/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,489/wk
$2,577/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,454/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Manningham
16.2%
Affordable
Cockatoo Valley
15.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Manningham
♂ 51.6% ♀ 48.4%
Density: 2525 people/km²
Cockatoo Valley
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 47 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Cockatoo Valley
Lower Rent Manningham
Larger Population Manningham
More Affordable Manningham