O'Connor vs Turner

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
5,917 #1,321
👥 Population
4,470 #1,739
$1,261/wk #326
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,448/wk #145
$451/wk #1,037
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$480/wk #769
35 years
🎂 Median Age
31 years
$2,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,901/mo
$2,518/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,330/wk
$3,463/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,199/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

O'Connor

17.9%
Affordable

Turner

20.6%
Affordable

O'Connor

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 1437 people/km²

Turner

♂ 47.5% ♀ 52.5%
Density: 2907 people/km²
Higher Income Turner
Lower Rent O'Connor
Larger Population O'Connor
More Affordable O'Connor

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level