O'Connor vs Samson

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
460 #5,150
👥 Population
1,881 #3,118
$914/wk #1,974
💰 Median Weekly Income
$752/wk #4,475
$335/wk #3,743
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$380/wk #2,445
38 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$1,766/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,950/mo
$1,639/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,833/wk
$2,263/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,207/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

O'Connor

20.4%
Affordable

Samson

20.7%
Affordable

O'Connor

♂ 48.9% ♀ 51.1%
Density: 242 people/km²

Samson

♂ 49.9% ♀ 50.1%
Density: 1723 people/km²
Higher Income O'Connor
Lower Rent O'Connor
Larger Population Samson
More Affordable O'Connor

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level