Rose Park vs Cockatoo Valley

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
1,375 #3,513
👥 Population
714 #4,463
$1,132/wk #602
💰 Median Weekly Income
$886/wk #2,299
$365/wk #2,840
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$383/wk #2,419
44 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,963/mo
$2,411/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,489/wk
$3,397/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,454/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Rose Park

15.1%
Affordable

Cockatoo Valley

15.4%
Affordable

Rose Park

♂ 49.7% ♀ 50.3%
Density: 2524 people/km²

Cockatoo Valley

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 47 people/km²
Higher Income Rose Park
Lower Rent Rose Park
Larger Population Rose Park
More Affordable Rose Park

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level