Home → Suburbs → Compare
Bannockburn vs Batesford
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
6,470 #1,193
👥 Population
1,141 #3,780
$845/wk #2,852
💰 Median Weekly Income
$952/wk #1,593
$390/wk #2,258
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$325/wk #3,947
35 years
🎂 Median Age
39 years
$1,863/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,268/mo
$2,055/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,837/wk
$2,232/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,881/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
3.3 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Bannockburn
19.0%
Affordable
Batesford
11.5%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Bannockburn
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 78 people/km²
Batesford
♂ 51.4% ♀ 48.6%
Density: 80 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Batesford
Lower Rent Batesford
Larger Population Bannockburn
More Affordable Batesford